He was the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, the executive committee of the. During those eighteen months, more than 20,000 french people were put to death by guillotine. I don't reckon that anybody would say providing food to the poor is unjustified. This question can be debated to no end by people on opposite ends of the spectrum. Overtime, feuds between political parties got to an all-time high.
With the radical Jacobins in power, the country was in tumult, and a Reign of Terror ensued due to a law of suspects that legalized local revolutionary committees. No one was safe from suspicion and a word against the government could mean a death penalty or jail time. Here the public armed themselves in order to attempt to overthrow the Republic and restore the monarchy to the way it. The period of the Reign of Terror, September 1793- July 1794, resulted in significant political and social changes in France. These deaths soon became a public view to anyone to witness, a view no one could forget, yet something to celebrate. They killed these people for being suspect coutner revolutionaries, those that sought to restore the monarchy. As such the new republic was under great threat of being overthrown.
Terrorism can be defined as an unlawful violence or war deliberately targeted to civilians. This essay peels through the layers of the remarkable years from 1789 through to 1794 to explore the catalysts of that period of the French Revolution characterized by political repression and widespread violence known as la Terreur, or, The Reign of Terror. Pro's end result argument is hence, rendered invalid. Drowning was also a method used in the French Revolution. The overarching goal of the Revolution was to place the power of government… 1316 Words 6 Pages liberty developed into the Reign of Terror.
In a speech witnessed by the nation in January 1932, one year before his appointment as German chancellor, Adolf Hitler concluded. Was it the work of men carrying out God's will on Earth? The Reign of Terror, the radical phase of the French Revolution, ended on July 28, 1794, when Robespierre went to the guillotine. There's nobody against the revolution to kill! France was experience a great amount of change in the summer of 1793, when the Jacobins succeeded the moderates in the National Convention. It can also be defined as a systematic use of terror to coerce or violent acts intended to create fear. Ancient Rome, Augustus, Caligula 2099 Words 6 Pages One of the key proponents of Nazi ideology was a promise to birth a new Germany.
Even today, democracies and republics around the world give the ruling government emergency powers if they are under threat, and fighting half of the world is a huge threat which justifies the Tribunal member's recieving their emergency powers. The nation was fighting with clear imperialistic intentions in mind; a majority of people saw the Spanish Empire as an obstacle to fulfilling the Monroe Doctrine and allowing American political and economic command over the entire Western Hemisphere, which made any possible. Unfortunately, with the invention of the guillotine, Louis was just one of tens of thousands killed in such a manner. Some believe that the terror occurred to stop counter-revolutionaries, such as the War in Vendée, and happened because of the factions between the Jacobins and Girondins. I could use this same argument and say that the ultimate result is that France is a democracy today whose principles of liberté, égalité, fraternité liberty, equality, brotherhood were based on the principles of the revolutionary period.
There is, perhaps, and argument for Stalin's. Whilst it is true that Nicholas did manage to restore his authority through economic, political. What kind of government can realize these wonders? The United States helped France by giving financial and military aid. In one swift stroke Japan had silenced yet enraged the whole of the United States. In conclusion, Robespierre was just as bad as Louis, if not worse. A combination of food scarcity and rising prices led to the overthrow of the Girondins and increased the popular support of the Montagnards, who created the to deal with the various crises. The group gainedcontrol over a large part of French government and sought toconsolidate their power by eliminating those who opposed theirpolicies.
They would cut the heads of criminals and even innocent without trial. The Reign of Terror had a lot of conflict both internally and externally. Maximilien Robespierre has always provoked strong feelings. They killed thousands of innocent children and women and tortured thousands of innocent men without any proof of them being guilty. The blade of the law should hover over all the guilty. In a wave of executions followed. This air campaign killed an estimated 600,000 civilians and destroyed or seriously damaged some six million homes.
In order for terrorism to exist, the victims must be civilian. From the very beginning, when the colonists first migrated to America the colonists were displeased with Great Britain's law-makings and government. Maybe it was all a cover-up Pro has repeatedly made allegations in an attempt to undermine my arguments but does not back his statements up with hard facts or adequate reasoning. That he knew it is certain and demonstrable: he is condemned by words he himself spoke before The Terror first took post - revolutionary France in its grip. The reign of Terror was a violent and savage part of the French Revolution. For example, the writer of Answer 2, justifies terrorism because it appears to be the only way to counter the violence of an occupying army. I dont see the logic here.
It is easy to be a great leader when times are good, but a good leader only proves himself during rough times. I'm not given an answer by either debater. But it was not justified to execute innocent people just because they suspected them to be counter revolutionary citizens. Redford states 'Hatshepsut was not blind. Sympathy for Germany, was an accept that mainly concerned the British.
The French have done a superb job of instilling all of us with the concept that. This period is famous for its execution of the many thousands of people Pro pointed out. The internal threat was also serious enough to justify the Reign of Terror. So if they do not want to fight a war, why are they rebelling against their own country? People aren't complaining about the military draft any more. Conclusion: There are many opinions on this subject for example others may say, the Reign of Terror was justified because being violent and taking extreme measures was the only way people would listen and react. During the late 1700s in France, there was trouble. Committee of Public Safety, French Revolution, Guillotine 1070 Words 3 Pages liberty developed into the Reign of Terror.