There are numerous times Hamlet does not act when he should, like his inability to act on his father's murder, his mother's marriage, and his uncle's assuming of the throne. Despite the fact that we wasted an entire round is okay with me. But Hamlet erases that side of himself from the book and volume of his brain and replaces it with the commandment of his warlike father. Hamlet, like all the other major characters, is untrue to himself. They push Hamlet to accept his father? Hamartia appears first, as it deals with the leading male of the story, and actually aids in the deliverance of tragedy in the final scene of Act V. Polonius was the father of Opheila and Laertes. His inability to act on decisions led him, and basically everyone else to their untimely death.
With the definition of an Aristotelian tragedy, Hamlet's tragic flaw is hubris. A tragic flaw is a character trait that ultimately causes the downfall of the protagonist. Hamlet directly identifies his own tragic flaw, remarking of his own inability to act. This was the perfect time for Hamlet to face Claudius. Horatio acted as an advisor to Hamlet, but he did not tell Hamlet that he was heading in the wrong direction.
Although the reader is not aware of it yet, words will drive the action of the play. By carefully analyzing the Shakespearean play Hamlet one can debate whether the main character Hamlet is a tragic hero. Tragic Hero: a character who is more virtuous than the typical civilian but has a tragic flaw which causes his downfall. In this scenario that calls for quick decisive behavior, Hamlet is too busy thinking. I would rather say his tragic flaw is his selfishness - he is so busy avenging his father that he injures his mother, Ofelia, Polonius.
Throughout the play Hamlet is deeply hurt by his mother s decision to remarry his uncle. The fact that his own uncle could kill his father leaves Hamlet dumbfounded and confused. Yet once again, even when coming upon Claudius all alone praying in Act 3, Hamlet uses a rationalized excuse to pull himself away from achieving his goal. This was the perfect time for Hamlet to face Claudius. Hamlet eventually succeeds in killing Claudius but ends up dying in. He is then, as strange as it sounds, acting by acting. And by extension: to reach one destination rather than the intended one; to make a mistake, not in the sense of a moral failure, but in the nonjudgmental sense of taking one thing for another, taking something for its opposite.
Rather, I see him as a semi-sympathetic character for his human-like flaws of character, but, as such, he also possesses some serious flaws and is not altogether a sympathetic character for me. Hamartia is a literary device Shakespeare uses in Hamlet; the main… 974 Words 4 Pages The Flaws of the Tragic Hero Hamlet in Shakespeare's Hamlet With Hamlet being generally labeled as the best tragic hero ever created, it is ironic that his tragic flaw has never been as solidly confirmed as those of most of his fellow protagonists. As the play progresses, however, Hamlet finds it difficult to execute such a murderous task. As he knelt praying Hamlet walked up behind him undetected with the perfect chance to avenge his fathers death. Many consequences can arise when one procrastinates.
As the play progresses, however, Hamlet finds it difficult to execute such a murderous task. He also rashly judges Ophelia as being rude and cruelly makes fun of and betrays her. She has not run off with Claudius or anything of that nature. Mixed in with this immense sense of grief, are obvious feelings of anger and frustration. Horatio is left standing alive. These flaws are understandable, but not at all sympathetic. He refuses to spy on everybody else, despite the fact that everybody else except for Horatio is spying on him.
Hamlet is the most written about tragedy in the history of man. Is it because Hamlet has a tragic flaw that creates his downfall? In addition, it is difficult to tell from the text alone whether some of the character traits are genuine or how many might be the product of his feigned insanity. Instead, Hamlet writes a play in which the actors play out the same story the ghost tells Hamlet. There is no set purpose, no straining at a point. Hamlet has a tragic flaw in his personality and behavior.
Nobody as smart as Hamlet is going to make a rash decision to kill his uncle without evidence. He also tells her to repent, but all just so he can delay the fact that he has to kill her for breaking her marriage vows to King Hamlet. Its main character, Hamlet, possesses a tragic flaw which obstructs his desire for revenge and ultimately brings about his death. This is why it makes it rather surprising when he is unable to act upon what he knows is crucial to the restoration of virtue and fairness to the Denmark throne. Primarily, answering to yourself whether Hamlet has, in fact, lost his mind would benefit. Also, Hamlet should have acted more swiftly on this, then her confession could have taken place earlier in the play.