Evaluating the prevailing circumstances, the psychological health of the criminal, in his or her motivation behind the crime are all factors that cannot be marginalised. What if we execute an innocent person? On one hand, laws are established to define the framework in which people can freely act without breaking them. For example, imposing the death penalty to both murderer and terrorist who have committed to the same type of crime seems reasonable to many people. What they fail to see is that an emerging nation may not be able to cope with their conventional style of functioning. For instance, China in 2003 enacted capital punishment laws for preventing corruption the law is for preventing an evil.
Laws are considered to the most basic requirement of human morality, making it the reason why this issue has become controversial. On the other hand, some argue that it is not proper to give the reins of the nation in raw hands. Man, in his needs, has different motivations for law in society. It is a fair system, and it leaves people with no doubt that breaking the law is not tolerated. If there are fixed punishments for murder, both of them will receive the same punishment.
In a nutshell if fixed punishment is accepted then it would be very cruel system as the mentioned method will not consider whether the prisoner committed the crime for the first time or not, the punishment will be the same. Essay topic: Some people think that it is more important for the government to spend money to promote healthy lifestyle to prevent disease than to spend it on treatment for people who are already ill. Some people insist that each type of crime should have its own fixed punishments. If the matter is viewed objectively, it is true that fixed punishments will take away a lot of wrong practices from the judicial system. It could be less effective than life inprisoment.
Firstly, the advantage of utilizing a standardized punishment for a certain crime would less complicate the regulatory concept which helps increasing understanding of citizens about crimes and their paybacks. Thirdly, there is strong likelihood of becoming repeated offender if people are given serious punishment just for minor offence which would have negative impact to the society. In this case, there must be fixed punishments, such as fines, suppression of documents and so on. In addition, the fixed punishments can act as a warning. It is obvious, for example, that a person who commits culpable homicide, would have an attentive motive, in comparison to the one unintentionally do so.
For family of victims, the person was precious and they may not care about the cause of the death because the fact that the person died is not different whether the cause is a murder or a car accident. Faults is maybe too soft of a term for this. On one hand, there is a school of thought that punishment should be fixed for any criminals. This is no doubt much less expensive than for investing money to treat actually ill people. Can it be wrong to try to reduce murders? Any of their hasty decisions may have serious consequences. If we look at the statistics, about 130 people wrongfully convicted people were sentenced to death and were lucky to be exonerated and released, eventually in past few years. For example, a murder for self-defense is completely different from a murder for revenge and it would be unjust if both are considered the same.
With the rapid development of society, there are a great number of difficult to the nation management. They still believe that when decide on the punishment for the crime, we should always take the circumstances of the individual crime, and the motivation for committing it into account. I too have the same view of this people as it is very genuine and clear. Similarly, a first time offender should not be treated the same as a repeat offender. On the other hand, sometimes a crime may be committed by a person inadvertently.
This essay will take a look at this issue from both points of views. In fact, I have never met anyone who found it difficult to use a bank account. With apropos of this fact, I believe having a fixed punishment for a particular crime, could be unjustified in most of the cases. However, other people claim that it is essential to take into account that what is the condition that a crime happens and why people commit crimes. Therefore that is harm for regulating the gap between the innocent and the crime. There are many murders each year; very few wrongful convictions. Otherwise, your essay is just a list of items which are not related to each other.
Answer: Different kinds of atrocities happen all over the world and there are certain regulations that prohibit people to participate in acts which are against the law. People with Munchausen syndrome may make up symptoms, push for risky operations, or try to rig laboratory test results to try to win sympathy and concern. On the whole, I agree with both these views, but my personal view is that minor crimes should have fixed punishment but major crimes deserve through investigation. A lot of people have no job thus they prefer to do misconduct to fulfil their daily need. For example, if someone is found guilty of stealing, the judge will simply follow the rules and apply the appropriate punishment.
Essay topic: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. The victim was chained to the post, stripped to the waist and whipped. Every thief, child or adult does not matter, is convicted in the same way. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.