In fact, juvenile crime was already falling by the time states were tightening the screws. They need to keep them locked in cells and only let out at certain periods of the day for exercise and meals. This issue is of concern and has raised eyebrows concerning the nature of human development and justice Bergman, Bergman and Berman-Barret, 2009. After the crimes have been committed and the lives of these children have been radically changed, society often demands that those who commit violent crimes be tried as adults, rather than as adolescents. Since it has been established that children make rational decisions, it would not be wrong to suggest that if children are awarded with severe punishments for their crimes, they would consider the cost of committing a crime while making a decision regarding whether or not to indulge in deviant acts.
Should juveniles be tried as adults? Senators are steadily weighing tougher standards for juvenile offenders, partly because of massacres like Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. A youthful offender that shows real remorse is less likely to return to the system as a recidivist. Normally children are regarded as angels, beings that can not harm a thing. He was going to find out whether he would live or die. The opposition believes that holding court cases where juveniles remain tried as adults undoubtedly violates the rights of the juvenile. Would it be ok telling a twelve year old kid that has committed a crime, that he or she is sentenced to doing life in prison.
Its formation was a reaction by the community that saw the effects of the adult criminal system on children. As more and more states move towards juveniles being tried and sentenced as adults, problems have arisen from juveniles being housed with adults. Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults? Juvenile offenders should not be tried as adults because when given the death penalty they endure societal alienation. They are exposed to the harsh cruelty of penitentiary life where most are raped, beaten, and subjected to any abuse seen and known in these prisons no matter their age, mental and emotional state. According to the justice system of the United States, a person described a juvenile delinquent when he is under 17 years of age and takes part in a criminal activity that would warrant him being. The author considers this drop as a result of fear.
The Juvenile Justice System was created in the 1800's to reform United States policies regarding youth offenders. Just as Derrion Albert was an innocent bystander who loss his life to reckless and senseless acts of violence, our world has lost its viable claim of goodness to acts of hate against humanity. The current debate over juvenile crime is being dominated by two voices: Elected officials proposing quick-fix solutions, and a media more intent on reporting violent crimes than successful prevention efforts. While I agree that sentencing a youth offender to a term of punishment to be carried out with adult offenders may continue the devastating cycle of violence in our culture, I do not agree that juvenile offenders should receive a smaller sentence or easier punishment on the basis of the affects of cross imprisonment. Changing the social environment in which juveniles live is a more effective in reducing juvenile violence than punishing them in adult courts.
Essay - Should Juveniles offenders be tried and punished as adults. Would it be ok to sentence a child to the death penalty, throwing a childs life away by ending it in prison. Each year thousands of juveniles under the age of 18 are arrested. First, I believe that juveniles should not be tried as adults because their… 624 Words 3 Pages case for many juveniles, some as young as 13! Juveniles who are tired as an adult and sentenced to prison find it extremely hard to survive while in prison. Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? It is common sense that humans adapts to their surroundings and are influenced by their upbringing that can determine who he or she may be in the future.
Almost all fifty states have changed their juvenile justice laws allowing more youths to be tried as adults and scrapping long-time efforts to help rehabilitate delinquent kids and prevent future crimes. Steinberg and Scott's studies show that juvenile offenders should not be held to the same adult standard of criminal responsibility Fagan. As the laws have gotten stricter on discipline the kids have gotten wilder. First, trying juveniles as adults portrays a double standard. Although juvenile crime is greatly decreasing, the general public continues to fear that this crime wave will occur. By the facts and opinions that I have stated, I believe that juveniles should not be tried as adults. One of the most controversial being whether to try juveniles as adults or not.
This led to overcrowding which prompted redesigning. The crime level of children is much less than the media reports, crimes committed by juveniles are only 13% of violent crimes Williams 2. Paraphrase: Adult felony recidivism was examined in Florida, and they found pairs which one juvenile would be transferred to a criminal court and the other would be retained in the juvenile justice system. The proceeding was no less solemn, no less tragic by reason of being in a juvenile court. He also discusses how many advocates and academics argue that juveniles are not being given enough of a chance to turn their lives around after committing minor offenses. In todays society, there are many crimes going on.
Juveniles should not be tried as adults. Cengage Learning; 6 edition, 2012 Read Full Essay Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper This essay is 100% guaranteed. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Most young criminals are also controlled by organizations run by unlawful adults who promise them a way out of poverty and misery when they truly are shortening their lives. When talking about juveniles being tried as adults there are no easy answers, but when all the factors have been weighed, with the exception of murder, the negative affects of juveniles in the adult system outweigh the positive. Were they considered adults before they carried out an act of violence? In some cases they are waivered into the adult system automatically such as in homicide cases.
Many experts do not accept that biology alone creates children who kill. The purpose of juvenile court is to treat and guide the children rather than punish them. This does not mean that the offender must not stay in prison or receive no punishment at all for his or her acts but those punishments should be handed out in consideration with the physical and mental development of the child and the circumstances in which the offender committed the crime. When a juvenile commits a crime that the courts feel they should be tried as an adult there are ways that the court has to transfer the juvenile from juvenile court to adult court. Underage offenders, being anyone under the age of 18, should not be subject to criminal punishment in adult courts because they are not mature enough to be fully responsible for their actions. Do these juveniles have the capacity to truly understand the crimes they are committing? They have been shown to reduce crime substantially when compared to imprisonment after crimes have been committed. Children cannot be blamed for their incompetence because it is merely a factor of development.