The structural consequences of language death. With globalisation comes an almost inevitable joining together of cultures, experiences and languages. I strongly agree that local languages have to be protected. Well, a nation may consists of so many communities that speak different languages. First, different languages present their own history and culture.
Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. It might be convenient and easy for people to communicate in our daily life by using only a few languages. There are a variety of systems that have been proposed for measuring the vitality of a language in a community. East Africans need to speak Swahili for success; Central Europeans need to speak Russian; and lately, the whole world seems to need to speak English. No doubt the main purpose of a language is to facilitate communication between people. Apprentices also teach their own children the language and meet with groups of adults for weekly conversation.
Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. This process of change has been described by Appel 1983 in two categories, though they are not mutually exclusive. For example, understanding Nihonggo requires intensive study of words and idioms. That is why the English language is worldwide spoken because it facilitates communication among distinct nationalities. This tendency to include language identity in national identity is also something I find quite negative since it is the usual vehicle for oppression and xenophobia.
The extinction of one language implies the lose of an unique cultural. Firstly, traditional languages should not be neglected because it is an identity of each country. So to maintain its uniqueness and to pass it onto their descendants it is important to keep the language alive in its own original area. Both languages have grown in numbers of speakers over the past few decades. Often speakers replace elements of their own language with something from the language they are shifting toward. Revitalization programs are ongoing in many languages, and have had varying degrees of success.
It does not just mean slaughter but also humaneness and kindness. A good thing to do is to make your second body paragraph in to a list of bullet points, like this: On the other hand, culture and tradition is rooted within language. Every language that dies prior to being recorded and analyzed is truly a loss to comparative typology not to mention comparative linguistics. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa. English is a good example. Le souffle de la langue.
And also, it is clear that, beauty of world depend on various cultures and its specific features. And also, it is clear that, missing word beauty of world depend on various cultures and its specific features. In conclusion, I personally disagree with the opinion that with only several languages that exist in the world, life will be easier. This essay will argue that economic growth should not be a primary focus for development. However, this heritage is partly dying.
The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. Most of such languages are spoken by a tribe and people of this tribe have developed in terms of education and lifestyle and have accepted a new language. As she sat next to me, I couldn't help but notice the heady aroma of her perfume andthe way her hair swung aside to reveal the delicate contours of her neck. As an example, using English as a capital language unites a majority of people around the world. This essay will first discuss the importance of language to culture, and secondly the fact that learning a few common languages is unrealistic, followed by a reasoned conclusion. When the world is the similar, experience new and thrilling things seems meaningless. A number of other published works on measuring language vitality have been published, prepared by authors with varying situations and applications in mind.
We as a society would lose valuable information if languages go out of use. To conclude, I infer that it is a catastrophic for the future of mankind. With the help of language people can easily express their thoughts and feelings toward each other. Moreover, I suppose, like a tree that never grow without its roots, a hardly could a society also progress without its languages and roots. As a result, it becomes a burden on other people to study the language they are not used to.
Methods of language endangerment research: a perspective from Melanesia. We can taste a variety of fruits and vegetables from all parts of the world. The result is a fascinating and multifaceted Israeli language, which is not only multi-layered but also multi-sourced. Therefore, if we only speak one or two languages in the entire world, it would turn out in a monotonous and tedious place to live. As for me, I side with the former one.