Brick by brick, word by word, a community was built around these twelve men. I will begin by given a short synopsis of…. Amidst… 3445 Words 14 Pages Introduction 12 Angry Men 1957 is one of the most acclaimed feature films of all time. He tried to draw other jurors into analysis the evidence technically and making sure if they are worthy of declaring the boy guilty of the charge. Juror 5 then changes his vote. If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men. He lashes out against the accused kid because he cannot lash out against his own son from whom he is estranged.
You know where you stand with an authentic leader as they openly express their thoughts and feelings In the movie, Davies is very honest and transparent about his position. At the beginning, he was not sure that the boy was guilty but he was sure that the evidences provided are not strong and sufficient enough to proof the boy guilty of charge. The chief premise of this movie is to prove his guilt or innocence in front of a deliberating jury. Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar. The men take a break. Four, on the other hand, reacts negatively to these displays of emotion.
A Practical Application More important than the ability to identify examples of leadership and cooperative communities within the film is my personal ability to apply those lessons in pursuit of my own cooperative, productive, and moral community. Immigration and diversity seem to have plagued the world now more than ever and it is no surprise that the business world has been changed tremendously. His speech offends Juror 5, who turns his back to him, and one by one the rest of the jurors start turning away from him. Although entirely set in a cramped, humid jury room except for the few minutes…. Or is he expressing courage in standing alone? As the guard goes to get the switch knife, Juror Four leads the jury in establishing the facts surrounding the knife. The opposing views of the jurors were utilized in order to understand differing perspectives. Overview of Film A young man who is 18-years is on trial for the first-degree murder of his father, who the prosecution is trying….
The judge further informs them that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence. GradeSaver, 30 April 2012 Web. Creative and innovative members of a community are more likely to consider a more wide range of ideas in an effort to develop the most effective solution that will be accepted by the widest range of individuals. The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. The term was coined by Robert Terry in 1993 but was popularised by Bill George. Juror Seven, meanwhile, expresses his impatience to get to a current Broadway show that night. Thus, leading to a greater community.
When those remaining in favor of a guilty vote are pressed as to why they still maintain that there is no reasonable doubt, Juror 4 states his belief that despite all the other evidence that has been called into question, the fact remains that the woman who saw the murder from her bedroom window across the street through the passing train still stands as solid evidence. Although he exhibited a tendency toward avoidance, eventually he contributed to the discussion. The vote, which begins as 11-to-1, shifts gradually. It is through this process of sincere listening that members of differing worldviews can begin to build personal relationships that are important during community dialogue Kouzes and Posner, 2003. The movie gives us various characters of differing levels in society all bound together for one purpose, to find the truth in the evidence given which may result in a death sentence for the accused.
The story is based on a television play by , later made into a movie by , with Rose and Henry Fonda acting as co-producers and putting up their own money to finance it. Words: 964 - Pages: 4. In that way, toward the end the ceiling began to appear. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. Few filmmakers have been so consistently respectful of the audience's intelligence.
It is now up to the twelve men of the jury to decide the fate of the defendant. While actively listening to feedback and other remarks, he went on to prove faulty evidence that became undeniable to the other jurors one by one. This is an important ability in the current economy. Davis casts a not guilty vote. Conceding that he has merely , Juror 8 suggests a secret ballot, from which he will abstain.
Lumet uses closeups rarely, but effectively: One man in particular--Juror No. Twelve strongly expressive men accumulate into a small group in the court where they will all come to a consensus on whether a boy is to be charged guilty or innocent. Juror Five responds by telling of growing up in a slum and playing in a place full of garbage. Their hidden area is immense, resulting in an equally large blind area. We cannot decide in five minutes. She was particularly inspired by immigrant Juror 11's monologue on his reverence for the American justice system. When the case reaches the jury, the majority of the 12-member jury has no.
He used experiments to force other members to think outside the familiar. Thus, it is significant to identify the exact manner in which Henry Fonda the 8 th Juror formed a cooperative community within the vastly different worldviews present in the deliberation process. It represents a perfect example for applicable of a work group development framework. The film does not reveal names of the jurors that serve to distance us from each jury member thus inviting us to objectively scrutinise their individual prejudices and character traits. Juror Four tries to make peace between Juror Eight and Juror Three with the observation that they should not use emotional arguments. During this break, it begins to rain outside.